Review



eiger2 x 4m saxs detectors  (Dectris AG)


Bioz Verified Symbol Dectris AG is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol Dectris AG manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
    • 98
      Buy from Supplier

    Structured Review

    Dectris AG eiger2 x 4m saxs detectors
    a)Schematic of the human femoral neck showing the superior and inferior anatomical regions, alongwith the locations from which thin sections and micropillars were extracted. b) Schematic representation of bone ultrastructure, showing the hierarchical organization and the relative scale of the imaging voxel (25× 25 ×25 µm 3 ). c)Typical 3D RSM, displaying the 4 analyzed scattering signals relating to the MCF organization: collagen equatorial scattering (1), collagen meridional scattering (2), mineral platelet thickness scattering (3), HA (002) diffraction (4). The blue arrow indicates the main MCF direction. d) Scattering intensity along the three orthogonal directions relative to the MCF orientation, indicated by the arrows in (c), plotted across the <t>SAXS</t> and WAXS regimes. e) Schematic representation of SASTT (i) and 2D scanning SAXS/WAXS (ii) experimental setups and location of scattering signal (4) on WAXS (only avaliable in the 2D experiment) detector. f) SAXS detector with location of scattering signals (1-3), and plot of scattering intensity in function of the azimuthal angle ϕ in the scattering range (3), indicated by the shaded ring. The mean intensity ( a 0 ), 2D degree of orientation ( a 1 /a 0 ) and orientation (Φ) of the scattering signal are indicated.
    Eiger2 X 4m Saxs Detectors, supplied by Dectris AG, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 98/100, based on 1108 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/eiger2+x+4m+saxs+detectors/bio_rxiv__64898__2026__03__03__709216-288-51-50?v=Dectris+AG
    Average 98 stars, based on 1108 article reviews
    eiger2 x 4m saxs detectors - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
    98/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "Combination of 3D and 2D small and wide angle X-ray scattering imaging reveals diminished bone quality in the superior human femoral neck cortex"

    Article Title: Combination of 3D and 2D small and wide angle X-ray scattering imaging reveals diminished bone quality in the superior human femoral neck cortex

    Journal: bioRxiv

    doi: 10.64898/2026.03.03.709216

    a)Schematic of the human femoral neck showing the superior and inferior anatomical regions, alongwith the locations from which thin sections and micropillars were extracted. b) Schematic representation of bone ultrastructure, showing the hierarchical organization and the relative scale of the imaging voxel (25× 25 ×25 µm 3 ). c)Typical 3D RSM, displaying the 4 analyzed scattering signals relating to the MCF organization: collagen equatorial scattering (1), collagen meridional scattering (2), mineral platelet thickness scattering (3), HA (002) diffraction (4). The blue arrow indicates the main MCF direction. d) Scattering intensity along the three orthogonal directions relative to the MCF orientation, indicated by the arrows in (c), plotted across the SAXS and WAXS regimes. e) Schematic representation of SASTT (i) and 2D scanning SAXS/WAXS (ii) experimental setups and location of scattering signal (4) on WAXS (only avaliable in the 2D experiment) detector. f) SAXS detector with location of scattering signals (1-3), and plot of scattering intensity in function of the azimuthal angle ϕ in the scattering range (3), indicated by the shaded ring. The mean intensity ( a 0 ), 2D degree of orientation ( a 1 /a 0 ) and orientation (Φ) of the scattering signal are indicated.
    Figure Legend Snippet: a)Schematic of the human femoral neck showing the superior and inferior anatomical regions, alongwith the locations from which thin sections and micropillars were extracted. b) Schematic representation of bone ultrastructure, showing the hierarchical organization and the relative scale of the imaging voxel (25× 25 ×25 µm 3 ). c)Typical 3D RSM, displaying the 4 analyzed scattering signals relating to the MCF organization: collagen equatorial scattering (1), collagen meridional scattering (2), mineral platelet thickness scattering (3), HA (002) diffraction (4). The blue arrow indicates the main MCF direction. d) Scattering intensity along the three orthogonal directions relative to the MCF orientation, indicated by the arrows in (c), plotted across the SAXS and WAXS regimes. e) Schematic representation of SASTT (i) and 2D scanning SAXS/WAXS (ii) experimental setups and location of scattering signal (4) on WAXS (only avaliable in the 2D experiment) detector. f) SAXS detector with location of scattering signals (1-3), and plot of scattering intensity in function of the azimuthal angle ϕ in the scattering range (3), indicated by the shaded ring. The mean intensity ( a 0 ), 2D degree of orientation ( a 1 /a 0 ) and orientation (Φ) of the scattering signal are indicated.

    Techniques Used: Imaging



    Similar Products

    eiger2 x 4m saxs detectors  (Dectris AG)
    98
    Dectris AG eiger2 x 4m saxs detectors
    a)Schematic of the human femoral neck showing the superior and inferior anatomical regions, alongwith the locations from which thin sections and micropillars were extracted. b) Schematic representation of bone ultrastructure, showing the hierarchical organization and the relative scale of the imaging voxel (25× 25 ×25 µm 3 ). c)Typical 3D RSM, displaying the 4 analyzed scattering signals relating to the MCF organization: collagen equatorial scattering (1), collagen meridional scattering (2), mineral platelet thickness scattering (3), HA (002) diffraction (4). The blue arrow indicates the main MCF direction. d) Scattering intensity along the three orthogonal directions relative to the MCF orientation, indicated by the arrows in (c), plotted across the <t>SAXS</t> and WAXS regimes. e) Schematic representation of SASTT (i) and 2D scanning SAXS/WAXS (ii) experimental setups and location of scattering signal (4) on WAXS (only avaliable in the 2D experiment) detector. f) SAXS detector with location of scattering signals (1-3), and plot of scattering intensity in function of the azimuthal angle ϕ in the scattering range (3), indicated by the shaded ring. The mean intensity ( a 0 ), 2D degree of orientation ( a 1 /a 0 ) and orientation (Φ) of the scattering signal are indicated.
    Eiger2 X 4m Saxs Detectors, supplied by Dectris AG, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 98/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/eiger2+x+4m+saxs+detectors/bio_rxiv__64898__2026__03__03__709216-288-51-50?v=Dectris+AG
    Average 98 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    eiger2 x 4m saxs detectors - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
    98/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    a)Schematic of the human femoral neck showing the superior and inferior anatomical regions, alongwith the locations from which thin sections and micropillars were extracted. b) Schematic representation of bone ultrastructure, showing the hierarchical organization and the relative scale of the imaging voxel (25× 25 ×25 µm 3 ). c)Typical 3D RSM, displaying the 4 analyzed scattering signals relating to the MCF organization: collagen equatorial scattering (1), collagen meridional scattering (2), mineral platelet thickness scattering (3), HA (002) diffraction (4). The blue arrow indicates the main MCF direction. d) Scattering intensity along the three orthogonal directions relative to the MCF orientation, indicated by the arrows in (c), plotted across the SAXS and WAXS regimes. e) Schematic representation of SASTT (i) and 2D scanning SAXS/WAXS (ii) experimental setups and location of scattering signal (4) on WAXS (only avaliable in the 2D experiment) detector. f) SAXS detector with location of scattering signals (1-3), and plot of scattering intensity in function of the azimuthal angle ϕ in the scattering range (3), indicated by the shaded ring. The mean intensity ( a 0 ), 2D degree of orientation ( a 1 /a 0 ) and orientation (Φ) of the scattering signal are indicated.

    Journal: bioRxiv

    Article Title: Combination of 3D and 2D small and wide angle X-ray scattering imaging reveals diminished bone quality in the superior human femoral neck cortex

    doi: 10.64898/2026.03.03.709216

    Figure Lengend Snippet: a)Schematic of the human femoral neck showing the superior and inferior anatomical regions, alongwith the locations from which thin sections and micropillars were extracted. b) Schematic representation of bone ultrastructure, showing the hierarchical organization and the relative scale of the imaging voxel (25× 25 ×25 µm 3 ). c)Typical 3D RSM, displaying the 4 analyzed scattering signals relating to the MCF organization: collagen equatorial scattering (1), collagen meridional scattering (2), mineral platelet thickness scattering (3), HA (002) diffraction (4). The blue arrow indicates the main MCF direction. d) Scattering intensity along the three orthogonal directions relative to the MCF orientation, indicated by the arrows in (c), plotted across the SAXS and WAXS regimes. e) Schematic representation of SASTT (i) and 2D scanning SAXS/WAXS (ii) experimental setups and location of scattering signal (4) on WAXS (only avaliable in the 2D experiment) detector. f) SAXS detector with location of scattering signals (1-3), and plot of scattering intensity in function of the azimuthal angle ϕ in the scattering range (3), indicated by the shaded ring. The mean intensity ( a 0 ), 2D degree of orientation ( a 1 /a 0 ) and orientation (Φ) of the scattering signal are indicated.

    Article Snippet: The samples were raster scanned with a step size of 25 ×25 μm 2 over a 5× 5 mm 2 area in the central part of each quadrant with an exposure time of 0.1 s at each point, and the scattered X-rays were collected on X-Spectrum Lambda 3M (WAXS) and Dectris EIGER2 X 4M (SAXS) detectors placed 0.134 m and 6.9 m downstream of the samples respectively.

    Techniques: Imaging